I have written before about attraction and have tried previously (fairly badly and in copious words) to explain my understanding of it and approach to it. I was reading an entry on sex and disability at My Private Casbah, and started to think further on the mysteries of human attraction and sexuality. Hmm, I see that entry was posted on my birthday… too bad I didn’t read it that day, because it and the accompanying video really are a gift.
Anyway, I really do most often see sexual relationships as a deeply profound mystery. My husband is the only person I have ever had sex with, so my relationship with him is my only reality in terms of partnered sex. In other areas of life where I wonder “how it is” for my friends or acquaintances, it’s usually possible for me to either ask directly, or to peer (when invited) into their homes and relationships and gain some insight to help answer my question. I may not know what it’s like to be a parent or divorced or to have a partner who is constantly absent or at work, or how others experience more mundane aspects of life such as food preparation and housework, or just what life is like in general for another couple or family, but I can experience firsthand at least the most superficial features of these differences from my own life, if not gain a complete understanding. By contrast, the nature of how other couples relate to one another sexually is opaque to me. Don’t get me wrong; it’s not something I would “like” to see; I do not actually want an altered reality where it would be appropriate or desirable to intrude on the most private, intimate moments of my friends or neighbors or random people in the grocery store. But lately for some reason I have been longing to know, to understand, the essence of what it means for other couples to relate to each other physically. What do they do that they call “sex”? But more importantly, why does that work for them, and what role does sex play in their lives? How does their attraction to one another manifest itself? How can it be that even couples who don’t outwardly seem to like each other much still find physical connection to be an important and necessary part of their lives?
I think this wondering explains my recent fascination with material like these films (I haven’t seen any of them in their entirety, and definitely NSFW). Certainly no film or narrative can truly explain what sex is or what it means, but I think these documentaries might be more “true” than traditional porn or sex tips in Cosmo. Mainstream sources might help me understand the purely mechanical ins and outs (ha!) of what society-at-large defines as or believes (or at least what they say they believe) to be “sex,” but don’t really answer my questions. For example, the fact that as a society we are mostly on board nowadays with oral sex and the clitoris is a great thing, but simply knowing how to get yourself or someone else off doesn’t necessarily guarantee that you will be able to have sex that you consider great or meaningful, now or in the future. And while knowing how to give a better blow job (though preferably based on your partner’s input, not a how-to article) might be a positive thing for both of you, this improvement is unlikely to be the profound center of your sexual relationship as a couple. Perhaps the general fact that you want blow jobs to be better for your partner is a better outward expression of the essence and meaning of sex in a relationship.
Also, secondary to the fact that mechanics can’t fully explain the meaning of sex and sexuality, as I touched on in my last post with respect to attraction, I think sources like porn and Cosmo may actually be detrimental to a search for understanding. Just as looking at fashion “do”s and “don’t”s in People, following Shape‘s latest spot-reducing workout, reading “hot or not”-type posts on celebrity gossip sites, or believing everything I read about obesity in the mainstream media would tend to actually obscure my ability to understand what is attractive to people as a whole and why people are attracted to one another, absorbing mainstream information about what sex is and what it means seems like it actively leads to incorrect conclusions and incomplete understanding (perhaps largely due to sexism, ageism, racism–e.g. assumptions about people’s sexuality or sexual preferences based on their race or race/gender–ableism, transphobia, and other forms of societal prejudice that attempt to homogenize or prescribe beliefs about and experiences of sex [ETA: I can't believe I forgot homophobia there. Geez.]).
So instead of being prescriptive about what the parts of the equation called “sexiness” or “attraction” or “love” must consist of for everyone (often-assumed examples include thinness, “prettiness,” and the ability to use the lower half of your body)–an approach that I have always felt is wrongheaded but lately have become more and more convinced is impossibly small and more importantly utterly untrue–wouldn’t it be better to see each sexual relationship as a small miracle? Considering that further, a great book on sex (again, link NSFW) that I have asks, in the context of a discussion of sex and morality, whether it isn’t possible that two unmarried people lovingly sharing oral sex might bring greater joy to God than an unhappy married couple having joyless, compulsory intercourse. Simplified and hypothetical though that question may be, it allowed my views on sex and morality to fall into place when I first read it. Where sex produces joy in both or all parties participating, and is not misused to hurt or to seek only one’s own pleasure, I believe that it is a good thing to be thankful for, and that it brings joy to god (as I understand god, which is to say in a woefully limited way) as well.
The mechanics of how bodies connect to one another are a matter of personal preference and physical constraints (imposed by one’s genitalia, disability or lack thereof, body size and shape, and other factors), but somehow these mechanics when put into practice become more than an engineering problem that can be solved logically for the purpose of allowing people to have orgasms, end of story. Instead, sex takes on a much greater meaning that is a large part of self for many people, and allows a tender, profound connection between human beings who desire to interact with each other in this way–fat people, thin people, mentally and physically disabled people, non-disabled people, people who can communicate efficiently with each other using language and people who can’t, people of different sexes or genders or the same, people whose genitalia don’t “work” the way society says they should. And all of these human beings are pairing with each other in an infinite variety of combinations (I mean, look at that list and consider the two characteristics that are the least likely to be compatible in your own mind, then realize that somewhere there are people with those two characteristics enjoying a fulfilling sexual relationship, and probably a lot more of them then you or I might believe).
I have come to a point, for example, where my former belief that nobody would ever be attracted to me because of my weight is not only something that makes me angry on my own behalf for the way in which it denies my sexuality and attempts to force the world as I experience it into a toxic, tiny, sterile box–but is also a belief that I no longer even understand or can relate to. Reality is just far too complex for that belief to be true or for its premise to make any sense. (Not, of course, that this stops society from hurting, denigrating, and ostracizing fat people on the general belief that this statement is “true” in combination with the idea that discerning what seems to be physically attractive to the majority accurately answers the question of “what is attractive?” Or “what is the essence of attraction and sex?”)
I’m sure I’ll continue pondering sex and sexuality and the meaning of life, probably because I am a living human being and that’s what we do. (For example, recently, I found this thread at Shakesville–also probably NSFW–very nourishing, thought-provoking, and positive as I considered some of my questions.) Sexuality continues to be deeply mysterious to me. I may not understand how it works for everyone else, but it does, and I am thankful for it.
November 16, 2008 at 3:31 am
Yay for sex!
Thanks for pointing to that Shakesville thread.
I am not feeling brave enough to blog about this myself at the moment, but let me just say that being fat hasn’t ever been a barrier to me to a varied sex life. I had many partners (an average number, I would say) before I got married and have never been dissatisfied with the sexual aspect of my marriage.
Lately, if I worry that being fat makes me feel less sexy, I try to turn that around by reminding myself of what the experience actually is for my husband and myself, and that my fatness in no way interferes, in fact, it only enhances it.
I hope that wasn’t TMI.
November 16, 2008 at 4:33 am
I love that! I think the key, as difficult as it is, is to sort of live in reality as you describe rather than absorbing what the media tells us sex “should” be or what it should require to be “good.”
I’m glad you brought up your experience as far as number and variety of partners and suspect it is probably fairly typical, that is, I doubt if fat people and thin people on average have vastly different experiences (qualitative or quantitative) with sex as they go through life. I hate to sound like I’m lecturing fat people, like “Oh, it’s all in your head, how stupid you are to think that nobody could be attracted to you” because there is no question that fat people get the short end of the stick when it comes to finding dates and partners. So it’s definitely not all in our heads. But I think these problems are due mostly to social prejudices rather than some actual objective fact that nobody wants to sleep with a fat person. I mean, sure, maybe it’s true that fewer people in our society are attracted to me than they would be to someone thinner, but there should still be plenty of partners and genes to go around. Love is sort of a crapshoot regardless of your body size, I think.
Also, definitely not TMI. I’m not a big person to call TMI anyway, and certainly not with respect to this post. (Though I’m sure I’d feel different if my mother was reading; then again, if that were the case I wouldn’t have written this in the first place.)
Anyway, thanks for sharing your perspective!
November 16, 2008 at 8:03 am
Good morning SpacedCowgirl. My morning stats check showed an incoming link from your blog, so I came over to have a look, and I must say I am very flattered and somewhat humbled to see our films mentioned in this essay. Even without seeing them in their entirety, you seem to have gleaned what is (for me a least) a very important theme in my films; that there is something about “the mystery of sex” that is almost completely unaddressed in cinema, and that being able to “see” that mystery, without actually having to intrude on your neighbors helps us see ourselves a little more clearly.
I think you might enjoy reading this post from my blog.
http://www.comstockfilms.com/blog/tony/2006/05/22/embracing-flesh/
November 16, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Tony–wow, thank you so much for your kind words and for commenting here, and for pointing me to your blog post. I am not an abuse survivor myself, but I can identify with so much of what Jen B. said in her letter in that post.
Yes! That’s it, I’m going to tell my husband that we need to own your films.
As Jen B. said, I am unused to being so moved by what many people would call porn, or so struck by the tenderness in the couples’ interactions (even just from the previews). It seems to help with some of the questions and wonderings that I have been experiencing.
November 16, 2008 at 1:49 pm
[...] morning’s stat check shows an inbound link from Spaced Cowgirl. As a matter of course I followed it back. That’s what you do. You follow the link, leave [...]
November 16, 2008 at 2:23 pm
You’re really making my day, SCG! As you can see from the ping back, you post inspired a fairly verbose response on my blog.
RE: Tenderness
I guess that’s where I end up feeling so alone, yet knowing I’m not alone. In all the explicit depictions of sex, from art-house films, to pornography, to sex-ed, where is the tenderness, the emotional engagement, the compassion and empathy, the just plain wanting to be there? How is it these simple, common experiences of sexual connection are so utterly uncommon in how sex is portrayed?
November 16, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Tony, all I can say is ITA, thanks again, and you are making my day too. I have tears in my eyes here. Dang it!
November 16, 2008 at 5:54 pm
i don’t know if i actually posted this – i own 2 comstock films, love them, such a beautiful, healthy approach. wish the bodies were less perfect. . .. have watched all the previews.. . they ROCK! thanks for this post -
November 16, 2008 at 10:50 pm
Kathleen, I hear you about the bodies; although they are not “porn-star perfect” (well, except for the one with the actual porn stars
), they are certainly all “traditionally attractive.” I’d love to see someone do something of this type with one or both partners being fat or visibly disabled or older, or something like that. But anyway, I am glad to see that you enjoyed the films so much, and am excited to see the full versions for myself. Thanks for your comment.
November 17, 2008 at 4:30 pm
RE: Older
Here are some SWSFW excerpts from our upcoming film “Bill and Desire: Love is Timeless”
http://www.youtube.com/user/ComstockFilms
Enjoy!
November 19, 2008 at 6:09 pm
RE: Older
You might enjoy these Somewhat Safe For Work excerpt from our upcoming film “Bill and Desiree”
http://www.youtube.com/user/ComstockFilms
November 19, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Cool, thanks for the update, Tony.
November 20, 2008 at 6:13 am
spacedcowgirl – this is a great post. Thanks for linking to the Comstock films – it’s made me realise that you hardly ever see sex as an ordinary and everyday part of a relationship (but there is still a central mystery of sex, as Tony mentioned above).
November 20, 2008 at 8:30 pm
Thanks, tgfm–that is a great way of putting it, that you “hardly ever see sex as an ordinary and everyday part of a relationship,” even though of course it is or can be.
November 23, 2008 at 8:14 pm
[...] importantly, these films have touched people’s hearts, opened people’s eyes, and even changed people’s minds about what is possible in the collision of sex and the moving [...]